Publication database of NCMM , project MORE and MathMAC center.
Dear guest, welcome to this publication database. As an anonymous user, you will probably not have edit rights. Also, the collapse status of the topic tree will not be persistent. If you like to have these and other options enabled, you might ask Jaroslav Hron for a login account.
This site is powered by Aigaion - A PHP/Web based management system for shared and annotated bibliographies. For more information visit https://github.com/aigaion.
 [BibTeX] [RIS] [Request]
A note on the modeling of incompressible fluids with material moduli dependent on the mean normal stress
Type of publication: Article
Citation:
Publication status: Published
Journal: International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics
Volume: 52
Number: 41-45
Year: 2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2013.01.003
Abstract: In incompressible materials, both fluids and solids, a part of the stress is not prescribed by constitutive specification, that is, the part of the stress is not determined in terms of kinematical quantities, temperature, et cetera. This “indeterminate” part of the stress is variously referred to as the “constraint stress”, the “reaction stress” or the “Lagrange multiplier” enforcing the constraint. In the case of an incompressible Navier–Stokes fluid, the part of the stress, that is a consequence of the constraint, also happens to coincide with the mean value of the stress which is referred to as the “mechanical pressure”. However, in general non-Newtonian fluids this is not the case, and, unfortunately, in view of the widespread use of the Navier–Stokes equation, the terminology “pressure” is used interchangeably for both the part of the stress that is not constitutively specified and the mean value of the stress, leading to considerable confusion with regard to important issues concerning non-Newtonian fluids. Recognizing the distinction between the mean value of the stress and the part of the stress that is not constitutively specified becomes critical in materials whose moduli depend on the mean value of the stress. An example of the same concerns the viscosity, which depending on whether it is a function of the indeterminate part of the stress or the mean value of the stress could lead to different flow characteristics. In this short note we discuss an error that is a consequence of not recognizing the distinction between these different quantities that are misidentified as being the same, the mechanical “pressure”.
Keywords: Analytical solutions, Maxwell fluid, mean normal stress, pressure, thermodynamic pressure, viscoelastic materials
Authors Průša, Vít
Rajagopal, K. R.
Added by: [VP]
Total mark: 0
Attachments
    Notes
      Topics